This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ring-buffer-benchmark-fix-the-wrong-sched_priority-of-producer.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.
>From 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Long <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:12:37 +0000
Subject: ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer
From: Wang Long <[email protected]>
commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.
The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Wang Long <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_
if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
struct sched_param param = {
- .sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+ .sched_priority = producer_fifo
};
sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m);
} else
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected]
are
queue-3.14/ring-buffer-benchmark-fix-the-wrong-sched_priority-of-producer.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
