On 09/26/2012 05:05 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > On 09/25/2012 03:51 PM, Tim Gardner wrote: >> Gents - commit b398aa3174cdfd4d85964fa84004e53ce6a13cab in vanilla >> v3.5.3 appears to be causing a regression. Testers claim success with >> that single patch reverted. See http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045027 >> beginning with comment #12. >> >> Any thoughts on how to fix this? There is also some discussion about >> emulate_invalid_guest_state in prior comments that might provide some >> clues. >> >> rtg > > Hi All, > > Some additional interesting details. Commit b398aa31 causes this bug[0] > in v3.5.3. However, the commit was also applied to v3.6-rc1(Commit > b246dd5d, which was actually cherry-picked for v3.5.3). However, > testing has shown that the bug does not seem to happen in v3.6. >
3.6 has had a lot more (unbackportable) work in this area. I'll see if this can be fixed, if not, we'll revert it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
