Em 03-12-2012 22:26, Prarit Bhargava escreveu:
On 12/03/2012 07:03 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
Prarit/Mauro,
Should this patch go into stables as well?
I have no objection to it going to stable, but will leave the final decision to
Mauro.
It seems ok to send it to stable for the stable versions that got the
HERM patches (e. g. EDAC core version updated to 3.0.0). Adding it
to older ones would cause regressions.
In other words, if the following patch exists at -stable, then
I recommend backporting this fix:
commit 5156a5f4e058b906c1e8c0fe2ab16f30b60dee96
Author: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Date: Thu May 10 12:43:01 2012 -0300
edac: Increase version to 3.0.0
There were lots of changes introduced to justify renaming it to
3.0.0:
- EDAC core were redesigned to represent all types of
memory controllers;
- EDAC API were redesigned to properly represent the memory
controller hierarchy;
- a tracepoint-based API were added to report memory errors.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
