On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 09:41 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 03-12-2012 22:26, Prarit Bhargava escreveu: > > > > > > On 12/03/2012 07:03 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > >> Prarit/Mauro, > >> > >> Should this patch go into stables as well? > > > > I have no objection to it going to stable, but will leave the final > > decision to > > Mauro. > > It seems ok to send it to stable for the stable versions that got the > HERM patches (e. g. EDAC core version updated to 3.0.0). Adding it > to older ones would cause regressions. > > In other words, if the following patch exists at -stable, then > I recommend backporting this fix: > > commit 5156a5f4e058b906c1e8c0fe2ab16f30b60dee96 > Author: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]> > Date: Thu May 10 12:43:01 2012 -0300 > > edac: Increase version to 3.0.0 > > There were lots of changes introduced to justify renaming it to > 3.0.0: > > - EDAC core were redesigned to represent all types of > memory controllers; > > - EDAC API were redesigned to properly represent the memory > controller hierarchy; > > - a tracepoint-based API were added to report memory errors. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]> >
Thanks for the commit id pointer. Found it in 3.6.x and not in any prior releases. I will do the back-porting work (patch applies cleanly, only testing really) for 3.6.x and send it out for 3.6.x. Thanks, -- Shuah -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
