Richard, When I'm trying to support multiple platforms it's often more convenient to fix the version of each of the several libraries that I use. There's certainly nothing wrong with collecting those links under an "obsolete versions" header or on another page, but not being able to get the particular version that I want has caused headaches in the past when minor-yet-significant changes occur.
Best, Kevin On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Richard Tew <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > The stackless downloads page.. > > http://www.stackless.com/download/ > > .. features every release of Stackless made. I am considering paring > it down to latest releases for each version. > > e.g. 2.5.2, 2.6.3, 3.0.1, 3.1.1 etc > > Anyone think there is a need to keep the links to the obseleted > versions available? > > Cheers, > Richard. > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless >
_______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
