Hi Richard, I agree with Kevin. Grouping old versions under a common link "obsolete versions" but somehow being able to access them I think it's a good idea, since there are also third-party applications out there still using API based on very old versions of stackless Python like 2.2. Cheers Nando From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kevin Kelley Sent: 26 October 2009 19:44 To: Richard Tew Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Stackless] Stackless downloads page Richard,
When I'm trying to support multiple platforms it's often more convenient to fix the version of each of the several libraries that I use. There's certainly nothing wrong with collecting those links under an "obsolete versions" header or on another page, but not being able to get the particular version that I want has caused headaches in the past when minor-yet-significant changes occur. Best, Kevin On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Richard Tew <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, The stackless downloads page.. http://www.stackless.com/download/ .. features every release of Stackless made. I am considering paring it down to latest releases for each version. e.g. 2.5.2, 2.6.3, 3.0.1, 3.1.1 etc Anyone think there is a need to keep the links to the obseleted versions available? Cheers, Richard. _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.32/2460 - Release Date: 10/26/09 08:10:00
_______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
