On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Peter Ingebretson <[email protected]> wrote: > Does this seem like a reasonable patch? Do you have any suggestions for how > this should be done differently; for instance, should sending a exception > type be deprecated now?
Hi Peter, Thanks for the patch. However, it goes against a previous change. Some time in the past Christian removed sending of exception instances, and replaced it with sending types and arguments. If the reasoning behind his change was because of problems it caused, then that would of course rule out any possibility of reversing it. Out of curiosity, can you give some examples of where you find it useful to do this? Cheers, Richard. _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list [email protected] http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
