2009/12/2 Kristján Valur Jónsson <krist...@ccpgames.com>: > Richard, wasn't the change a different one? In the old days, passing an > exception instance to channel.send() would magically raise it on the > receive() end. I think he added the send_exception() to explicitly send an > exception.
Not 100% sure, that's why I bring it up :-) I tracked down the thread: http://www.stackless.com/pipermail/stackless/2004-January/002692.html > I too find it odd that one cannot send an exception instance over like this, > although I've never came across a specific use case. Well, I missed the ability to do this when it was removed, but these days I am unable to think of any situation where it would be cleaner than sending the type and arguments to be raised. Cheers, Richard. _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list Stackless@stackless.com http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
