> There must be some boilerplate involved though? Given
> that you more than likely set up a channel and launch
> the tasklet, does a little more to take a passed exception
> and raise it, make that much more of a difference?
I could use a pattern like this:
...
except Exception as e:
c.send(WrapperException(e))
and then after receipt of a value from c do:
if isinstance(value, WrapperException):
raise value.e
I could also subclass channel to change the default behavior of send_exception
and receive to behave in this manner, but this at least partially defeats the
point of having a builtin channel.send_exception. Extending the semantics of
send_exception to allow passing an exception instance seems preferable to
either of these other approaches.
Thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Stackless mailing list
Stackless@stackless.com
http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
