2009/12/3 Kristján Valur Jónsson <krist...@ccpgames.com>: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Richard Tew [mailto:richard.m....@gmail.com] >> Sent: 2. desember 2009 21:50 >> To: Peter Ingebretson >> Cc: Kristján Valur Jónsson; stackless@stackless.com >> Subject: Re: [Stackless] Exception passing patch >> >> Ah well, if raising exceptions out of generators is valid, then I can >> hardly object to the same being possible with channels. But I do not >> think there is a reason to deprecate the old behaviour. >> > > Richard, you will notice that python's "raise" operator can take anything > from 0 to three arguments. > The first two can be: > - class and instance of class > - class and arguments (tuple, None, or any object) > - instance and None > > The third, if given, is an associated traceback to extend > No arguments will raise the current exception. > > How does it sound to have send_exception() emulate this three argument > behaviour?
In any case, the patch looks good to me. If you want send_exception changed to match raise, it's also fine by me. Richard. _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list Stackless@stackless.com http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
