I am having trouble building an installer on Mac OS X 10.9, (I had to change build-installer.py to change LDFLAGS).
@Robert Did you build the last installer on Mavericks with XCode 5.1? Did you do anything special ? My command line is: ./build-installer.py --sdk-path=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk/ --dep-target=10.8 --universal-archs=intel And I had to remove this from LDFLAGS: -syslibroot,/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.8.sdk I grabbed the source from https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless and trie to build from 2.7-slp branch. I'm thinking it is too much changes already just to build an installer, I must do something wrong. Cheers Hervé On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Filip M. Nowak <stackl...@oneiroi.net> wrote: > Hi there, > > On 03.04.2014 15:28, Hervé Coatanhay wrote: >> Hi FIlip, >> Both MacOS installer and homebrew use the framework-approach. This >> left prefix-approach for people that feels like hacking around IMHO. > > "hackishness" of prefix-approach is a matter of open discussion I would > say. I must admit that I used to prefix-based way (and it is extensively > used in many POSIX OSes packaging systems) but I agree that for Mac OS X > framework thingy is more proper. > >> For Homebrew, it might be as simple as creating a "keg only" Stackless >> Formula provided by a "Tap" on github. >> >> Concerning MacOS Installer, as I understand it, we're facing the >> following choice: >> >> - provide a Stackless installer which override official CPython >> installer (the choice made so far) >> - change build-script.py to change the "framework name" > > I would go for the second option (with installer) - but again, it's just > me. This would be less confusing, easier and probably safer for packager > himself :) . At the end what's the goal? Basically - to provide usable > and nice enough instance of Stackless for Mac OS x? If so this would do. > >> Does it sum it up well ? > > Absolutely. > >> Hervé >> >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Filip M. Nowak <stackl...@oneiroi.net> wrote: >>> (...) > > All the best, > Filip > > _______________________________________________ > Stackless mailing list > Stackless@stackless.com > http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless _______________________________________________ Stackless mailing list Stackless@stackless.com http://www.stackless.com/mailman/listinfo/stackless
