On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Olivier Grisel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Actually I made a mistake: the package names are already in lowercase.
That actually true. However I have to admit that there are still some
package names with upper case letter (e.g. [1]) that need to be
changed.

> However the project folders are not but I think it would be better if
> they were consistent with package names. Eg:
>
> entityhub/yard/embeddedSolrProvider =>
> entityhub/yard/embeddedsolr
>
> and
>
> entityhub/yard/solrProvider = > entityhub/yard/solr


The fact that "entityhub/yard/solr" is already the name used for the
module of the SolrYard was the reason why I called it solrProvider.
Initially I have not liked the idea to put this two modules within
"entityhub/yard" because they do not represent an Yard implementation
but I could also not come up with a better fitting location and so I
decided to give them rather long but clear names.

WDYT of using "." notation to mark "helper" modules
entityhub/yard/solr -> The SolrYard
entityhub/yard/solr.provider -> Solr provider
entityhub/yard/solr.embedded -> EmbeddedSolrServer

best
Rupert Westenthaler

[1] 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/trunk/entityhub/yard/solr/src/main/java/org/apache/stanbol/entityhub/yard/solr/impl/constraintEncoders/

-- 
| Rupert Westenthaler             [email protected]
| Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen

Reply via email to