Hi Steve,
Thanks very much for the update on this, we are looking forward to trying out the latest codebase; we'll raise any questions we have over changes and deprecations on the list.
That's perfect! The list and JIRA are the places.
Is this an appropriate point in time for us to upgrade to the latest SVN release in terms of any work-in-progress on revisions to the OntoNet API?
Yes I think it's time to take the step.
Also, do you have any guidance on STANBOL-426, about resolving identifiers between ontologies in Ontonet with identifiers from external systems? We'll of course look at this in the context of the revisions to the codebase, but any pointers you can provide will be gratefully received.
I did not have time to comment on that one too, but the OntologyProvider interface does provide a low-level implementation of this issue (i.e. getKey(IRI) where IRI can be either the logical or physical IRI of the ontology, and the Strings returned by the Clerezza provider can be made into UriRef)
We just have to check if it's worth escalating it to the level of scope/space/session.
I've also just raised a JIRA over the scalability issue we had which you're aware of, please let us know if the latest revisions also tackle this issue.
Great! It would be even better if you could provide more quantitative details such as the exact size of the ontology and the VM heap space.
Hopefully the Clerezza re-implementation helps out on this. There is still a conversion bottleneck if you need to access an ontology in OWL API form, but I am bugging the Manchester guys for a possible solution (a midlevel Clerezza adapter).
I am also considering making scopes and spaces able to export Clerezza Graphs as an alternative to OWLOntology objects, would that be of any use to you?
Alessandro
-----Original Message----- From: Alessandro Adamou [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 10:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: For Acuity: thanks for your JIRA Tickets on the Ontology Manager Dear Martin, Steve, Thanks very much for the issues just opened on Stanbol JIRA concerning ontology management. Most if not all of them were addressed in recent ontonet revisions, and I am documenting the changes with comments straight on the issue pages. Please feel free to follow up on them in case there are additional requirements or misalignments with the current state. I have roughly a couple of weeks to address any other issues coming up. As it turns out, some parts of the ontonet API were deprecated, but others could just not stay there and had to be removed altogether. I apologise if this gets to break any of your previous code, and will be glad to point you to their replacements in return. Thank you again for the great cooperation. Kind regards, Alessandro -- M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna Department of Computer Science Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna - Italy Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab) Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC) National Research Council (CNR) Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy "As for the charges against me, I am unconcerned. I am beyond their timid, lying morality, and so I am beyond caring." (Col. Walter E. Kurtz)
-- M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna Department of Computer Science Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna - Italy Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab) Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC) National Research Council (CNR) Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy "As for the charges against me, I am unconcerned. I am beyond their timid, lying morality, and so I am beyond caring." (Col. Walter E. Kurtz)
