Hi, with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-585 we should cut this RC6 and go for an RC7 that does not include any binary deps and instead uses a separate -deps package for them. - Fabian Am 16. April 2012 16:49 schrieb Fabian Christ <[email protected]>: > Hi Bertrand, > > thanks for checking. The difference is on purpose because the release > archive is a subset of the sources available in SVN. Now I understand > that the tag in SVN and the sources of the release package should > exactly match. But there will always be differences as some files are > only generated for the release package and are not checked into SVN. > > I have written an archiver to only include the releaseable files and > not everything from SVN. If we want to match releases against SVN, > this process will not work. Then we have to reorganize our SVN and > have all the releaseable stuff in one single folder that can be > zipped. Everything else must be somewhere else. > > Another way to do it right is to only release on a per JAR basis and > not to produce big source releases like I am trying it now. > > What should we do? What do we want? > > IMHO we should go and cleanup our SVN infrastructure. Maybe we should > add a new top level folder "stanbol" that will contain the releasable > stack. All other things like demos, infrastructure stuff, outdated > contributions is then automatically excluded. > > For the existing release branch I will go and remove everything that > does not belong to the release as Bertrand suggested. > > Best, > - Fabian > > Am 16. April 2012 16:16 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]>: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Fabian Christ >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> ...The release is available for download at: >>> http://people.apache.org/~fchrist/apache-stanbol-0.9.0-incubating-RC6/ ... >> >>> Release tag is: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/tags/0.9.0-incubating ... >> >> That doesn't match the content of the >> apache-stanbol-0.9.0-incubating-source-release.tar.gz, the "demos" >> folder for example is present in svn but not in the release archive, >> and there's quite a number of other differences. >> >> Can you fix that in svn, so that you don't have to recut the release archive? >> >> The way I check that is by doing a diff -r between the unpacked >> archive and an svn export of the svn tag. >> >> -Bertrand > > > > -- > Fabian > http://twitter.com/fctwitt -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
