Hi, 2012/6/26 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]>: > The building and running instructions on the websie suggests 1 GB for > running. So I think this confirms that having a low memory footprint is not > a main goal of the full launcher, as long of course as there is no leak > that would affect stability.
I think the 1GB were just chosen in the documentation to be safe during development so that nobody can complain. This is not a number that was chosen as a design goal and by this it confirms nothing. I understand that the zz> shell is only part of the full launcher right now? IMO memory is indeed not a problem for the full launcher as it comes with all and everything that we have to offer. I would suggest to not include the zz> shell in the stable launcher to make the stable launcher more optimized for productive environments. IMO the launchers that are provided by the community are just examples. People, who really use parts of Stanbol in their products should create their own launcher configurations anyway. Then they can decide what is in there. It is good to have examples like the full launcher that demonstrate what we have to offer. Best, - Fabian -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
