On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Fabian Christ <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > 2012/6/26 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]>: >> The building and running instructions on the websie suggests 1 GB for >> running. So I think this confirms that having a low memory footprint is not >> a main goal of the full launcher, as long of course as there is no leak >> that would affect stability. > > I think the 1GB were just chosen in the documentation to be safe > during development so that nobody can complain. This is not a number > that was chosen as a design goal and by this it confirms nothing. > > I understand that the zz> shell is only part of the full launcher > right now? IMO memory is indeed not a problem for the full launcher as > it comes with all and everything that we have to offer. I would > suggest to not include the zz> shell in the stable launcher to make > the stable launcher more optimized for productive environments. >
+1 for repurposing the stable launcher as suggested > IMO the launchers that are provided by the community are just > examples. People, who really use parts of Stanbol in their products > should create their own launcher configurations anyway. Then they can > decide what is in there. It is good to have examples like the full > launcher that demonstrate what we have to offer. > +1 Who write the usage scenario for doing so? best Rupert -- | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen
