Thanks a lot,
I have created ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-672
We can discuss possible names there. "ontologymanager.network" was an
option we had considered when we were renaming kres, but it's a bit
misleading as it seems to be handling low-level connectivity issues
rather than managing and preserving the networked structure of ontologies.
I guess this big change will call for a new separate release of the
ontology manager? I have been adding quite a few new features since
0.9.0-incubating (including an early persistence and portability support
for ontology network structures), so maybe once I've done a few more we
can do the renaming and call for a new release?
Best,
--alessandro
On 7/4/12 12:26 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Alessandro Adamou
<[email protected]> wrote:
...it appears that OntoNet (as I wrote it, with the capital N too) is a
registered trademark for an enterprise complexity analysis product by
Italian company Ontonix [1]. Apparently it does not involve ontologies, but
still...
What's the Apache way to go for these cases? Personally I will try to call
it another name in my Ph.D. thesis, but it's still used a bit everywhere in
the documentation, blog posts, REST endpoints, packages, artifact IDs....
Considering that it's the name of a software product, it's best to
change the name used in Stanbol, the steps outlined by Olivier look
good to me.
-Bertrand
--
M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou
Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
Department of Computer Science
Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna - Italy
Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab)
Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC)
National Research Council (CNR)
Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy
"I will give you everything, just don't demand anything."
(Ettore Petrolini, 1917)
Not sent from my iSnobTechDevice
