On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Alessandro Adamou <[email protected]> wrote: > We can discuss possible names there. "ontologymanager.network" was an option > we had considered when we were renaming kres, but it's a bit misleading as > it seems to be handling low-level connectivity issues rather than managing > and preserving the networked structure of ontologies.
why not simple "ontologymanager"? If you want you could create a ontology manager.servicesapi and have the implementation in "ontologymanager.network" and possible other modules. best Rupert -- | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen
