2012/8/7 Alessandro Adamou <[email protected]>: > IMHO nothing. If it is true that committership is never lost to inactivity, > then I wouldn't really make distinctions and introduce unwritten rules. But > I could be wrong on how the committer status is retained.
In principle right. But the list of initial committers in this podling was created by just collecting names of people with potential interest (as part of the IKS research project). I do not know if there is a rule, but for creating a strong community I would personally prefer that each committer should show at least once that he is willing to contribute. Neither a single mail nor a commit is IMHO not an application for being a committer. -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
