Dnia 09-06-2007, sob o godzinie 09:36 -0700, Justin Karneges napisał(a): > Wouldn't it be enough to just use a good, distributed XMPP server > deployment, > that also supports distributed MUC internally? Additionally, > distribution is > a hot topic, and everyone has different internal approaches > (including > special wire protocols between nodes). Just read any blog about > ejabberd.
That would enforce ejabberd on every deployment that wants to join the distributed MUC environment. I'm afraid that would make very unhappy the ones that don't think ejabberd is the best thing right after the bread and butter... -- Tomasz Sterna Xiaoka Grp. http://www.xiaoka.com/
