On Jun 21, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
Joe Hildebrand wrote:
A body inside the namespace for the particular PEP node is
perfectly fine, if it makes sense for that namespace. If a client
doesn't know about that namespace, it's not going to add the
+notify capability, nor subscribe to the node directly, so the
notification should never come to a client that doesn't know how
to process it; "process" here may mean just pull out the body
element in the appropriate namespace and display it in some
interesting way.
--Joe Hildebrand
user subscribes to a pep node, and later on a different resource
comes along on a different client which does not understand pep.
So you can have pep data getting pushed to resources which do not
understand pep.
Only if you're using explicit subscriptions, not if you're using
implicit caps-based subs, right? I see the use case now.
--
Joe Hildebrand
