Joe Hildebrand wrote:
On Jun 21, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
Joe Hildebrand wrote:
A body inside the namespace for the particular PEP node is perfectly
fine, if it makes sense for that namespace. If a client doesn't know
about that namespace, it's not going to add the +notify capability,
nor subscribe to the node directly, so the notification should never
come to a client that doesn't know how to process it; "process" here
may mean just pull out the body element in the appropriate namespace
and display it in some interesting way.
--Joe Hildebrand
user subscribes to a pep node, and later on a different resource comes
along on a different client which does not understand pep.
So you can have pep data getting pushed to resources which do not
understand pep.
Only if you're using explicit subscriptions, not if you're using
implicit caps-based subs, right? I see the use case now.
Yes, not implict subscription.
I assumed both are supported ?
Mridul
--Joe Hildebrand
