Andreas Monitzer wrote: > On Jul 06, 2007, at 14:13, Daniel Noll wrote: > >> It may even be desirable to enable this per-user.
I for one will completely disable this "feature". But I know that some users are interested in this "feature" (since it is "fun", for some value of fun). > Whether this means >> giving >> different users different disco results or giving the same result and >> silently dropping the packet, I'm not sure. I think I would prefer >> the third >> option, the sender getting a not-authorized error back. > > Isn't not-authorized an iq result, and thus not applicable for a message > stanza? If the message contains only the attention element (as it certainly should), then the recipient can simply ignore it. It's not necessary to return an error, IMHO. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre XMPP Standards Foundation http://www.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
