On 8/9/07, Jakob Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thursday August 9 2007, Sergei Golovan wrote: > > 3) (Theoretical question) If we look at client capabilities XEP (115) > > we may see that it reaches it's purpose if a features list isn't > > changed (since the last sent presence at least) and is the same for > > all members in the user's roster. Is this "floating feature" (which > > can be switched on/off) really compatible with XEP-0115? > > I'd say yes, the receiving client should re-disco or use a previously cached > caps hash.
The problem is which hash to include into a presence packet. It should be different for different recipients. But there's only one presence packet (usually). -- Sergei Golovan
