On 8/10/07, Andreas Monitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 10, 2007, at 15:12, Sergei Golovan wrote: > > > You're already use <iq/> to determine XEP support. So, I think that > > anyway the message should be sent to a full JID. > > > > As for potential memory leak I would say that it's better to leave > > this problem to a client developer. There are always clients, which > > behave incorrectly. Do you want to completely avoid using <iq/>s? > > No, but I want a specific reason to use an iq instead of a message.
I just want to get a result of attention query. And I don't like to make many disco#info queries to determine current state of the remote client. -- Sergei Golovan
