Andreas Monitzer wrote: > On Aug 10, 2007, at 23:05, Sergei Golovan wrote: > >> On 8/11/07, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Sergei Golovan wrote: >>> OK then: >>> >>> But the recipient's client must send a reply if we use IQ, which seems >>> wasteful for a little toy like this. >> >> Well, the first working draft of this toy (IQ-based, with a mandatory >> reply) consists of 67 lines of code. Is it too wasteful? > > I think he's talking about the network transfer waste, not the coding > waste. Since all clients need some kind of handling sending iqs and > receiving them, this is not really a concern.
Right. As I said in the jdev room (and I quote): [13:14:06] <stpeter> OMG you want a reliable transport for your stupid buzz messages?!?!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
