Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Andreas Monitzer wrote: >> On Aug 10, 2007, at 15:30, Sergei Golovan wrote: >> >>> I just want to get a result of attention query. >> Hmmm well, I personally wouldn't care about it (since you can't know if >> the user noticed it anyways), but I'm rather indifferent on it. What's >> the opinion of others on this list about it? > > IQ seems good to me. > > There are all sorts of potentially complicating factors involved here > (multiple resources) but I think they are relatively minor. Much depends > on the use case. Your examples showed one user sending the attention > request in the context of an existing chat session. In that context you > know the other person's resource and you are sending to that one because > you want to other person to pay attention to the chat session. If you > want to shake/buzz/etc. all of the user's resources then a message > headline would be better.
We discussed it a bit more in the jdev room: http://www.jabber.org/muc-logs/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2007-08-10.html#13:06:39 The more I think about it, the more it seems to me that this kind of feature is a "throwaway" -- do you really need to receive a reply? You just want to poke the other person. There's no need for a reliable transport with fancy error messages and all that. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
