Remko Tronçon wrote: >> IIRC, the problem was that >> the license doesn't allow one to redistribute modified RFCs. > > Why would they want to modify RFCs?
<reminder type='ianal'/> Many things might count as "modification": - translation into a language other than English - condensation (e.g., remove all the text and just show the examples) - inclusion of significant portions in software (think literate programming) - recording / performance (yes, I know, there's probably not a big market for recordings or performances of RFCs) - etc. See also: http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.html Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
