Mark Doliner wrote: > On Oct 24, 2007 at 1:50 PM Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> 6. XEP-0175: Best Practices for Use of SASL ANONYMOUS >> >> Approve version 1.1pre1? >> >> All Council members in attendance voted +1. Ralph to vote on the list. >> Dave raised issue about possible confusion regarding trace data. Council >> wordsmithed an acceptable solution during the meeting: >> >> http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep- >> 0175.xml?r1=1297&r2=1310 > > The revised text says, "although RFC 4505 allows the initiating entity > (client) to provide so-called 'trace data' when authenticating via SASL > ANONYMOUS, it is NOT RECOMMENDED to include trace data as the XML character > data of the <auth/> element (instead, the <auth/> element SHOULD be empty). > However, if trace data is included, the server MUST NOT use it for any > purpose other than tracing (e.g., in server logs)." > > However, this seems to conflict with section 7.5.5 of > draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis-04 [1] which shows a "malformed-request" failure > when this data is provided for SASL ANONYMOUS.
I think I already fixed that: http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3920bis-05.xml?r1=1294&r2=1296 Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
