Mark Doliner wrote: > On Oct 24, 2007 at 3:47 PM Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Mark Doliner wrote: >>> Oh, er, is "[ ... extremely-long-token ... ]" intended to imply >>> that the >> token is unusably long, like a million characters or something >> absurd? >> >> It's intended to mean that it violates the rule from RFC 4505: >> >> token = 1*255TCHAR > > I see, thanks. For what it's worth that wasn't immediately obviously > to me from reading the spec, but I'm not used to reading specs.
I've been intending to add explanatory text to each example but haven't finished that yet. Something to do for the next version. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
