Hello On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 04:24:17PM +0000, Richard Dobson wrote: >> I strongly suspect, given the way the discussion is going, that we either >> have to consider framing everything - and that's a huge break from XMPP - >> or else we need an escape mechanism that works. Or, of course, we decide >> to give up and frame using XML as now, and use base64 to cope. > Personally I think it would be better to do as someone already suggested > and have a separate connection for framed blobs that you maintain or > establish when needed to send those, sort of like XEP-0065, or why not just > use XEP-0065 itself??, and if the server you are using doesn't have a > XEP-0065 proxy then you can safely assume that the server administrators > don't want you sending lots of data through their server infrastructure.
You do not want to use 65 too much. If I skip the fact it is going to
get deprecated by jingle, probably, it is really heavy for small blobs,
like an icon or a funny image in a message. (Of course, it is the right
way for 1GB file you want to send).
--
Einstein argued that there must be simplified explanations of nature, because
God is not capricious or arbitrary. No such faith comforts the software
engineer.
-- Fred Brooks
Michal 'vorner' Vaner
pgp2CpNMCHfnO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
