-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rachel Blackman wrote: > Alternatively, if we have decided that sending 100k custom emoticons > over mobile phones generates 33k of 'needless' traffic which is a > deal-breaker to the point that solution is throwing out XMPP 1.0 and > starting over with 2.0, I would say that the more practical solution > here is not to support custom emoticons on mobile phones.
I remember, years ago, talking about a xmpp<->binary proxy designed for pay-per-byte environments. > I just think we may be overthinking this. I agree. - -- Jesus Cea Avion _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.argo.es/~jcea/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ jabber / xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ "El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBR0ynFZlgi5GaxT1NAQJOpAP/YNg3wc8eKJdQ6umXHfsMjG5hmtNWjSJP K1QaeeUURezccJhF60q5X4MbkMLEEXpE0F3aC/+qG+kabBsFjRflcwcaWdPvcazj myto0F/ayMg0E3wbDClu6kt6Yn1zmiu0EsNZe3+hdwiOrtxjeAAX67G3Q6voZAWP niZt1nT9q8U= =/B15 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
