Unnikrishnan V wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 8:59 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP. >> >> Title: Abuse-Related Errors >> >> Abstract: This specification defines an application-specific error >> condition for reporting abusive communications sent over an XMPP network. >> >> URL: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/error-abuse.html >> >> The XMPP Council will decide at its next meeting whether to accept this >> proposal as an official XEP. >> >> > It will be nice to add : > 1) negate a wrongly reported abuse ( after reporting as abuse realizing it > was not so -like sending a mail with a spell mistake are realizing after > pressing send button )
I think this abuse reporting mechanism would be used by a server to
report abuse to a peer (via some kind of automated rate-limiting or
traffic-checking), not by a recipient. Now, errors could occur in that
process ("oops sorry, we thought you were being abusive but it turns out
you weren't, really"). I suppose that might be reported the next time
the offending entity sends a packet over the s2s connection (I don't see
a strong reason to create a new IQ protocol for this).
> I am not sure we need to get a list so that we can correct the wrongly
> reported abuses.
I don't understand that sentence.
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
