On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unnikrishnan V wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 8:59 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > wrote: > > > >> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP. > >> > >> Title: Abuse-Related Errors > >> > >> Abstract: This specification defines an application-specific error > >> condition for reporting abusive communications sent over an XMPP > network. > >> > >> URL: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/error-abuse.html > >> > >> The XMPP Council will decide at its next meeting whether to accept this > >> proposal as an official XEP. > >> > >> > > It will be nice to add : > > 1) negate a wrongly reported abuse ( after reporting as abuse realizing > it > > was not so -like sending a mail with a spell mistake are realizing after > > pressing send button ) > > I think this abuse reporting mechanism would be used by a server to > report abuse to a peer (via some kind of automated rate-limiting or > traffic-checking), not by a recipient. Now, errors could occur in that > process ("oops sorry, we thought you were being abusive but it turns out > you weren't, really"). I suppose that might be reported the next time > the offending entity sends a packet over the s2s connection (I don't see > a strong reason to create a new IQ protocol for this). > > > I am not sure we need to get a list so that we can correct the wrongly > > reported abuses. > I was thinking like the abuse/SPAM report in yahoo, ex: when i login to messenger i used to get a list of messages which i dont really want ( so i report back to server this guy is SPAMing . Some time i wrongly report. Some time i like to say back to server- hey that was not a spam its my mistake to report. I am not sure got confused between SPAM and Abuse. > > I don't understand that sentence. > > Peter > > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > >
