On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, we have roster pushes so it seems like a good idea to use them (in > general I think we should make intelligent use of everything we've > already defined, such as presence and rosters and roster pushes and so > on -- other real-time communication technologies don't have these > features at the base level, so it's to our advantage to use them). I > think that something like what you suggest might work well. > > Also, before the devcon Dave Cridland mentioned that he didn't like the > XEP-0150 approach but at the devcon we somehow didn't hear from him on > this topic, so perhaps he could weigh in with his ideas here. In the next days I'm short in time for helping in authoring the XEP, but at least I can prepare the raw XML samples for handling diffs with roster pushses > >> - compression > > > > Under this topic nobody really seems ready to try the binary path > > Yes, so it seemed. Pedro Melo mentioned some further thoughts along > these lines at dinner one night, so he and I might work on a spec for > that. Right, Pedro? ;-) Oh yeah, I remember too. That will be a breakthrough in XML technology... ;) -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
