On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes that makes sense. But it sounds as if we don't yet know enough to > define session hush and session pause very well. Perhaps we need to talk > with more people who care about this kind of feature (as I did recently > at the eComm conference). Indeed suspend is not difficult, it's just one more "command" to be added to stanza acknowledgments (or an attribute to the existing <r/> or <a/>), simply telling the server to suspend the connection (timings can be negotiated at session level, such as we already do in BOSH with a careful setting of "wait" and "inactivity" attributes). Hush is the one that is difficult, since it is a sort of dynamic privacy list in which we set which messages can be considered important and at with which importance. Hush moreover has a meaning both when connected (e.g. I'd like to delay some messages for optimizing compression) and when disconnected (which messages can start a new connection?), and for this reason I think it fits a completely different XEP and we can wait for it... -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
