Fabio Forno wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes that makes sense. But it sounds as if we don't yet know enough to >> define session hush and session pause very well. Perhaps we need to talk >> with more people who care about this kind of feature (as I did recently >> at the eComm conference). > > Indeed suspend is not difficult, it's just one more "command" to be > added to stanza acknowledgments (or an attribute to the existing <r/> > or <a/>), simply telling the server to suspend the connection (timings > can be negotiated at session level, such as we already do in BOSH with > a careful setting of "wait" and "inactivity" attributes).
Yes I will add that to XEP-0198. > Hush is the one that is difficult, since it is a sort of dynamic > privacy list in which we set which messages can be considered > important and at with which importance. Hush moreover has a meaning > both when connected (e.g. I'd like to delay some messages for > optimizing compression) and when disconnected (which messages can > start a new connection?), and for this reason I think it fits a > completely different XEP and we can wait for it... I wonder if hush is really just a special privacy list, but I haven't had time to work out if that's true. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
