On Apr 25, 2008, at 11:12 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 This is interesting. Are you saying that we don't need private data
storage or PEP at all for Metacontacts? That would certainly simplify
 the deployment task. :)

No, I think it's saying there's a (inferior) work-around possible for
servers which don't support private/PEP.

More or less:

I'm saying that there is a inferior (no order attribute) solution to meta-contacts that only requires jabber:iq:roster.

Its not a workaround, its a different approach with different tradeoffs to solve the meta-contacts challenge.

Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use XMPP!


Reply via email to