Dnia 2008-03-29, sob o godzinie 19:44 +0000, Pedro Melo pisze: > there is a fallback > protocol that requires only the usual roster to keep meta-contacts. > If we assume that roster items with the same name + groups > (basically, if the tag algorithm above yields the same hash for your > roster entries) belong to the same meta-contact, we can implement > meta-contacts without the need of any extra storage, just the roster.
This approach is IMO far superior than the artificial meta-contacts XEP. I always advocated use of roster names to merge contacts into one contact list item. The meta-contacts XEP is a good example of over-engineering things that have good-enough real life solutions already. -- /\_./o__ Tomasz Sterna (/^/(_^^' http://www.xiaoka.com/ ._.(_.)_ im:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
