Dnia 2008-04-28, pon o godzinie 11:15 +0100, Pedro Melo pisze: > > I think his point was that implementing PEP just to get update > > notification for private storage is a bit heavy, and that he juts > > wanted to fix private storage instead.
Exactly. > I think that "just implementing notification for private storage" > will end quite similar to PIP in the end. Not at all. I was thinking more along the lines of roster and privacy-list pushes after item update. -- /\_./o__ Tomasz Sterna (/^/(_^^' http://www.xiaoka.com/ ._.(_.)_ im:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
