On 05/06/2008 1:37 PM, Alexander Gnauck wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre schrieb:
>> If there are no objections to this idea, I'll write up a little XEP or
>> two about this.
> 
> +1 for getting rid of the stream restart. I started this discussion
> several times in the past and never understood why we need them with TLS
> and SASL ;-)
> 
> * this saves us some round trips
> * gets us closer to "real xml"
> * makes the specs much cleaner because on some stream features we
> restart the stream (tls, sasl, compression), with otehrs we don't (bind,
> session).

Right, that's the idea.

While we're at it, let's make it clear that the server always sends a
new set of stream features whenever a feature has been negotiated (and
that it can send features anytime after the session has started).

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to