On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 13:42 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 05/06/2008 1:37 PM, Alexander Gnauck wrote: > > Peter Saint-Andre schrieb: > >> If there are no objections to this idea, I'll write up a little XEP or > >> two about this. > > > > +1 for getting rid of the stream restart. I started this discussion > > several times in the past and never understood why we need them with TLS > > and SASL ;-) > > > > * this saves us some round trips > > * gets us closer to "real xml" > > * makes the specs much cleaner because on some stream features we > > restart the stream (tls, sasl, compression), with otehrs we don't (bind, > > session). > > Right, that's the idea. > > While we're at it, let's make it clear that the server always sends a > new set of stream features whenever a feature has been negotiated (and > that it can send features anytime after the session has started).
Even after, say, resource binding? -- Groetjes, ralphm
