On 06/10/2008 2:56 PM, Tomasz Sterna wrote: > Dnia 2008-06-09, pon o godzinie 08:57 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre pisze: >>> But even though, presence MUST be handled by bare JID of this roster >>> item. >> So, if a user's client sends a subscription request to a full JID, >> should the user's server ignore the resource and send the request to >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> instead of <[EMAIL PROTECTED]/resource>? And if >> the contact's server receives a subscription request for a full JID, >> should it also ignore the resource? > > Exactly. > > >> I have some text to that effect in >> my working copy now (but I think it is MAY, not SHOULD or MUST). > > I think it should be SHOULD. :-)
It's SHOULD here: http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis-05.html#sub-request-outbound And here: http://www.xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis-05.html#sub-request-inbound It's possible that the version at ietf.org doesn't say that, because I messed up my submission. It'll be correct in version -06. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
