Justin Karneges wrote:
On Thursday 03 July 2008 11:07:41 Peter Saint-Andre wrote:Olivier Goffart wrote:Le vendredi 27 juin 2008, Michal 'vorner' Vaner a écrit :HelloOn Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 09:50:59PM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:I see that XEP-0085 ("Chat State Notifications") which can be thought as being a "spiritual successor" to the deprecated XEP-0022 ("Message Events") lacks support for the "message is stored in the server's offline storage" notification.Well, if it wasn't stored, you get an error. And if the server told you it did store it, you would know the user is not invisible, does not have you in his ignore list or so. It is not something people should want you to know. So, if you do not get an error, you can count on the message being delivered (now or later). (If it is different in real life, then it is problem of implementation and not of protocol). Did it help?If there is a network problem you might get nothing back.Won't XEP-0198 solve this (when it's done and implemented and deployed)?Yes, with XEP-0198, it should be possible to detect for a failed delivery, and to ensure reliable transmission of the bounce message.
I really will get to work on that spec again soon. :) Peter
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
