Yann Leboulanger wrote: > Jonathan Schleifer wrote: >> Many argue that privacy lists are too complex for invisibility or >> blocking users. For example, the Pidgin developers. They complained that >> they need to implement privacy lists completely in order to achieve >> invisibility and blocking. >> >> IMO, we could change the XEP to include some reserved names for priacy >> lists like blocked or invisible, so that all clients can use them >> together without any problems. Just setting & enabling a privacy thing >> is easy, the problem is interferences with other clients. This would be >> solved if we had some reserverd names for privacy lists. > > And how would be be invisible AND block some users (to not receive SPIM)?
Easy: use XEP-0186 to go invisible and XEP-0191 to block users. : Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
