Re: [Standards] Presence Leakage, and what we do about it.

[Jonathan Schleifer]

Am 14.10.2008 um 04:12 schrieb Justin Karneges:

What I'd suggest as a solution to this problem is to have two levels of

privacy: 1) roster subscriptions, and 2) presence.  Contacts with

something of that nature, revealing the past) unless you had a real
subscription.

subscriptions would have full access, but those with just presence (MUC rooms, or directed presence with someone not on your roster) would have more limited access. For example, with limited access you could send messages and maybe retrieve the vcard, but you wouldn't be able to request iq:last (or

--
Jonathan

That wouldn't be enough, as privacy lists and directed presences won't work then.

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part