mån 2008-10-13 klockan 14:42 -0600 skrev Peter Saint-Andre: > The XMPP Council would like to advance more of the XSF's standards track > specifications from Draft to Final. Background information can be found > here: > > http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0001.html#approval-std > http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0001.html#states-Draft > http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0001.html#states-Final > > In its meeting last week, the Council agreed to issue a "Call for > Experience" regarding XEP-0012: Last Activity. To help the Council > decide whether this XEP is ready to advance to a status of Final, the > Council would like to gather the following information: > > 1. Who has implemented XEP-0012? Please note that the protocol must > implemented in at least two separate codebases. > > 2. Have developers experienced any problems with the protocol as defined > in XEP-0012? If so, please describe the problems and, if possible, > suggested solutions. > > 3. Is the text of XEP-0012 clear and unambiguous? Are more examples > necessary? Is the conformance language (MAY/SHOULD/MUST) appropriate? > Have developers found the text confusing at all? Please describe any > suggestions you have for improving the text. > > If you have any comments on this XEP, please provide them by the close > of business on Friday, October 31, 2008. After the Call for Experience, > this XEP might undergo revisions to address feedback received, after > which it will be presented to the XMPP Council for voting to a status of > Final. >
One thing I was thinking about is determining the amount of time a user has been "idle". The way it works now is that, using this XEP, you'd send out an <iq/> get to find out. There is no way for a client to "push" this information as part of it's presence. One workaround could be to issue an <iq/> requesting "last" info when we receive an updated presence from a contact. But this wouldn't allow a client to be idle while still remaining "available", which could be desirable. I guess this might be out-of-scope for this XEP, and might be better handled in the core protocol, maybe... //Marcus > You can review the XEP here: > > http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0012.html > > Please send all feedback to the <[email protected]> list. > > Thanks! > > Peter >
