ons 2008-10-15 klockan 06:18 -0600 skrev Peter Saint-Andre:
> Marcus Lundblad wrote:
> > tis 2008-10-14 klockan 11:56 -0600 skrev Peter Saint-Andre:
> >> Marcus Lundblad wrote:

> >> I think the natural way to send idle time would be to include a notation
> >> when changing from available to away, or
> >> from away to extended away.
> >>
> > 
> > Sounds reasonable.
> 
> Indeed, the existing namespace could be used here:
> 
> <presence from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/orchard'>
>   <show>away</show>
>   <query xmlns='jabber:iq:last' seconds='720'/>
> </presence>
> 
> <presence from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/orchard'>
>   <show>xa</show>
>   <query xmlns='jabber:iq:last' seconds='7200'/>
> </presence>
> 
> Shall I add an example of that to the spec?
> 

This looks good IMHO.
Maybe we should mention the case when there is no such element in a
<presence/> to implicitly be interpreted as "not idle (0 seconds)".
F.ex. when a user comes back from idleness and the client sends updated
presence it would look like:

<presence  >
  <show>available</show>
</presence>

//Marcus

> /psa
> 


Reply via email to