Sebastiaan Deckers wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > 1. Who has implemented XEP-0012? Please note that the protocol must > implemented in at least two separate codebases. > > > I implemented this for Pandion a long while back. Client requests the > iq:last time to show the user when a currently offline contact was last > available. This provides useful information in many cases. > > > 2. Have developers experienced any problems with the protocol as defined > in XEP-0012? If so, please describe the problems and, if possible, > suggested solutions. > > > This specification is very trivial to implement. However the design is > inherently pull based, as others have mentioned. In the implementation > that I created that's an efficiency benefit, but making it push based > would enable many other kinds of uses for this information. PEP anyone?
In fact I think it would be find to push this information in presence. Or perhaps a server simply needs to notate last presence with a delayed delivery timestamp -- then you would not need iq:last at all, I think. /psa
