Brendan Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 02:23:52PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> So how would you tweak the text I proposed? > > I would make the paragraph for namespace well-formedness identical to > the one for plain well-formedness. > > I just noticed this clause: > > ... but MUST NOT return a stream error in response to the receipt > of [Bad XMLNS]. > > Why is that there? Silently dropping the stanza seems like a bad idea. > It also requires servers to be able to handle Bad XMLNS, which is a step > backward from where we are now.
That is the nub of the issue being discussed here. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
